What's wrong with this picture?By Tom Wilson, Section Opinions
![]() picture by Universal Studios As I write this, the news media all across the world is discussing the winners of the 2006 Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science Awards, the Oscars. As I review the lists of both winners and nominees in almost all major categories, I realize that almost none (with the exception of Walk The Line--Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role and King Kong --special effects and sound editing) of even the nominees has played at our local movie theater. More, including a poll (scroll down), in the Full Story...
To be sure, in our free-market society the owners of the Vernon Square Cinema have no legal obligation to provide us with a well-balanced offering of top-quality movies, but is there no inherent moral obligation (not to mention financial benefit) to let us locally see the best movies the industry has to offer?
I recognize that the demographic niche of adolescence is the largest movie-going group, but when I am forced to go to LaCrosse, Madison or Eau Claire to see intelligent adult movies, I always find those theaters well attended. Sure many of these movies are not without controversy. But is our community so backward that it needs to be shielded from the issues of racial bigotry, the power of international oil, the evils of the McCarthy era and the importance of a free press, and the harsh reality of violence and intolerance against homosexuals? If these subjects are too challenging for some individuals, they need not attend. But should our entire community be denied the opportunity to confront the critical issues that face our society and to enjoy the best cinematic art the industry provides? Am I missing the big picture?
Tom Wilson |
Poll
|
||||||